I read Eragon. I am impressed with Paolini's getting published and all, but I really am not very impressed with Eragon. I started Eldest... read like the first page, but never finished it.
It was written well enough, but the plot was a bit too simple for me. And the characters seemed too nice and too simple.
But a good word, it did have a certain charm in it's simplicity, and I can see why so many kids/teens would like it. But me... I feel I could do better. :)
Hmm... hard question. I liked Eragon, but I thought it was too stereotypical. Eldest got dumber as it went. Eragon is entirely too emotional, and doesn't give up on the wrong things (Arya...). I'm going to read the third book just to see what happens, but I don't really expect to like it. :-)
As for Christopher himself, I think it's amazing, and a credit to his perseverance, that he was published at 18, and I'm not saying he's a bad writer! I just think his first published story is too stereotypical/copycat. It will be interesting to see what he does as he gets older.
OK, good things first. I think Paolini is a genius for plot and the scope of an epic; he handles a lot of crazy threads and details without going crazy. With time, he's going to mature into a really good fantasy author.
However... originality isn't his virtue, as was mentioned. I hated Eldest, to be frank. The whole Arya saga is way too predictable and boring, and he CANNOT WRITE ROMANCE. He just can't. And some of the writing in "Eldest" was very bad.
But I think he proves that people love epic fantasies, the way High School Musical proved people love musicals. Some genres never die.
Discover Innovative's success in Chicken Soup: Extraordinary Teens on page 181, now in stores!
Innovative: A Word for the WriTeen
Welcome to Innovative, a website that can't decide whether it's a blog or an e-zine but enjoys the best of both worlds without ever quoting Miley Cyrus.
Innovative is here for those who think teenagers and writing make a smooth combination, and who enjoy book reviews. We primarily publish reviews through a writer's eye-- looking at writing style, characterization, originality and whether Gabrielle liked it or not.
Innovative publishes sporadic reviews and thoughts, mainly dependant on the schedule of Gabrielle's new collegiate life.
The Best Books of 2009 (So Far)
The Reformed Vampire Support Group (Catherine Jinks)
I'm the primary blogger of Innovative: A Word for the Teen. In the past, I've done everything from guest-blogging for New Moon to writing a column for KidMagWriters.com, and being published 40+ times in between. I write sporadic reviews of new books from a writer's perspective, and occasionally offer advice to teen writers when I'm not being a college freshman. Find out more about my success in Chicken Soup: Extraordinary Teens, now available in stores.
The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau- Banks (E. Lockhart)
Undone (B. Taylor)
For Authors and Their Publicists
I love to help authors spread the word about their books, and am very happy to work with publicists to arrange giveaways, interviews and book reviews. I just have a few guidelines.
Fiction: I review mostly young adult. I am willing to look at upper middle grade and adult if relevant to a teen audience, but this is on a case-by-case basis.
Nonfiction: Nonfiction must have to relate to some form of writing or writing by teenagers. Writing guides, market guides, how-tos, memoirs about writing, etc., are the best bet. And if a teen or group of teens have written a book, I'm interested.
4 comments:
I read Eragon. I am impressed with Paolini's getting published and all, but I really am not very impressed with Eragon. I started Eldest... read like the first page, but never finished it.
It was written well enough, but the plot was a bit too simple for me. And the characters seemed too nice and too simple.
But a good word, it did have a certain charm in it's simplicity, and I can see why so many kids/teens would like it. But me... I feel I could do better. :)
Hmm... hard question. I liked Eragon, but I thought it was too stereotypical. Eldest got dumber as it went. Eragon is entirely too emotional, and doesn't give up on the wrong things (Arya...). I'm going to read the third book just to see what happens, but I don't really expect to like it. :-)
As for Christopher himself, I think it's amazing, and a credit to his perseverance, that he was published at 18, and I'm not saying he's a bad writer! I just think his first published story is too stereotypical/copycat. It will be interesting to see what he does as he gets older.
OK, good things first. I think Paolini is a genius for plot and the scope of an epic; he handles a lot of crazy threads and details without going crazy. With time, he's going to mature into a really good fantasy author.
However... originality isn't his virtue, as was mentioned. I hated Eldest, to be frank. The whole Arya saga is way too predictable and boring, and he CANNOT WRITE ROMANCE. He just can't. And some of the writing in "Eldest" was very bad.
But I think he proves that people love epic fantasies, the way High School Musical proved people love musicals. Some genres never die.
Does HSM really count as a "musical"? ;-) I hated that one too, lol.
Post a Comment